Cursor Pricing in 2026: Every Plan, and Why Bills Surprise People

Since October 12, 2026, new Cursor customers buy it through The X Subscription: Free, Plus at $8 a month, Premium at $30, Super at $100 and Ultra at $200, with Teams seats at $30, $100 or $200 per user per month and Enterprise on request (Cursor pricing). Third-party models such as Claude, GPT and Gemini are no longer included in any new plan; on Premium and above they bill at API list price from prepaid credit. Existing subscribers can keep the legacy plans: Pro $20, Pro+ $60, Ultra $200, and Teams at $40 or $120 per seat.

Last checked: October 19, 2026, against cursor.com/pricing, Cursor's Models & Pricing, Team Pricing and Legacy Cursor plans docs, and SpaceXAI's October 12 announcement.

Cursor pricing in 2026: every plan explained

Cursor's pricing page and Models & Pricing docs list five individual tiers on The X Subscription, plus Teams and Enterprise. Every tier also carries Grok and X benefits, which this post leaves aside:

Annual billing costs $80 a year for Plus, $300 for Premium, $1,000 for Super and $2,000 for Ultra, which works out to two months free. Prices exclude tax (Cursor help).

What happened to Pro, Pro+ and Teams Standard

Cursor's previous plans are now legacy plans. They are closed to new customers, but existing subscribers keep their plan, price and features unless they switch, and switching is permanent. Cursor maps them like this:

The trade in that mapping: SpaceXAI says each new plan includes at least twice the coding usage with Cursor's own models as the plan it replaces, but the new plans drop the included allowance for third-party models. If most of your work runs on Claude or GPT inside Cursor, a switch moves that spend from included usage to prepaid credit at API list price. Compare both before you switch.

Why third-party models trip people up

The number that actually matters isn't the plan price, it's what happens when you leave Cursor's own models. On The X Subscription, each paid plan includes a weekly pool that covers only Cursor models (Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5 and Composer 2.5), shared with your Grok usage. Claude, GPT and Gemini are not in that pool at all: on Premium and above they bill at API list price from prepaid credit, from the first request.

Third-party spend tracks that model's underlying API rate, not a flat per-request fee. A simple syntax fix costs a fraction of a cent. An agent run that touches a large codebase on an expensive model can burn through several dollars of credit in one session. Superblocks' breakdown of Cursor's pricing (July 2026) names the three things that drained credits fastest under the old plans: manually picking premium models instead of Auto, enabling Max Mode, and working across large codebases that feed many files into every prompt. The first and third still apply; Max Mode now exists only on legacy request-based plans.

On legacy Pro, Pro+ and Ultra the same mechanics run through a monthly Other Models pool instead of prepaid credit. Either way, that's a genuinely different mental model from a flat per-seat SaaS price, and it's the single biggest source of "why is my bill higher than I expected" complaints.

How Cursor's usage pools work in 2026

On The X Subscription there is one weekly pool for Cursor's own models, shared across Cursor and Grok, and it refreshes every week rather than every billing cycle. Legacy plans keep two monthly pools. Cursor's Models & Pricing and legacy-plan docs, checked October 19, 2026, split them like this:

• Weekly pool (The X Subscription). Cursor's own models: Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5 and Composer 2.5. Usage past the pool, and every third-party request, is paid from prepaid credit through top-ups.
• Two monthly pools (legacy plans). Cursor Models for the same first-party models, and Other Models for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and others at each model's API rate. Pro, Pro+, Ultra and legacy Teams include both; Start and Hobby include only Cursor Models.

Which pool a request lands in decides most of your bill, because the published per-million-token rates differ by more than an order of magnitude. From that same docs page:

Here is what that spread means in practice. Take one agent run that reads 200,000 tokens of context and writes 20,000 tokens back, and price it three ways at those published rates. On Composer 2.5 it costs about $0.15. On Claude Sonnet 5, about $0.60. On Claude Fable 5.1, about $3.00. Same task, same editor, roughly a 20x spread, decided by a dropdown. Those are my numbers, not Cursor's: the arithmetic is simply the published rate times the token count I assumed, and your real runs will use different token counts. The point is the ratio, and the ratio is why two developers on identical plans can have completely different months.

Two details from the docs rarely make it into comparison posts. Opting in to regional data residency adds a 10% uplift on model pricing for eligible models. And on Teams and Enterprise plans, every third-party request also carries the Cursor Token Rate of $0.25 per million tokens, charged on input, output and cached tokens, including when Cursor Router's Balance or Intelligence mode routes to a third-party model, and including bring-your-own-key usage. Cost mode (the old Auto) and Cursor's own models are exempt, and individual plans don't pay it.

The June 2025 pricing change, and why people were angry about it

Before June 16, 2025, Cursor Pro's $20 gave you 500 fast requests a month with unlimited slow requests after that. It was a hard, predictable limit. On June 16, Cursor replaced it with the credit-pool system described above, and initially described the change in terms that made "unlimited usage" sound broader than it actually was, unlimited applied to Auto only, not to manually-selected models.

The result was a wave of surprise bills. Developers who kept selecting premium models by habit, the way the old plan encouraged since requests were flat-rate, burned through their $20 pool in days and then got billed at API rates for the overage. Complaints piled up fast: threads like r/programming's "Cursor: pay more, get less, and don't ask how it works" and r/ChatGPTCoding's "Used to Love Cursor. Now It's Pay More, Get Less" described the change as a silent nerf with no clear documentation of what had shifted.

Cursor responded in a July 4, 2025 blog post titled "Clarifying our pricing", where CEO Michael Truell wrote plainly: "Our recent pricing changes for individual plans were not communicated clearly, and we take full responsibility." The company committed to refunding unexpected charges incurred between June 16 and July 4, and clarified that median Pro usage at the time covered roughly 225 Claude Sonnet requests, 550 Gemini requests, or 650 GPT-4.1 requests before the pool ran out.

The complaints didn't fully disappear once the pool model settled in. A March 2026 thread on r/cursor raised a related concern: that agent workflows can generate large amounts of intermediate planning and context-caching tokens that count against the pool without being obvious to the person typing the prompt, making costs harder to predict even for users who understand the model in theory.

Every pricing change since 2024, and why the history matters to a buyer

A tool's pricing history tells you how often your budget line is likely to move. Cursor's has moved five times in two years:

The first row deserves a confidence label rather than a citation: it comes from a developer's compiled timeline of Cursor's pricing changes quoting old forum posts, and those old pages are not on Cursor's live site to check against. Treat it as context for how the model used to work, not as a number to plan against.

The Start row is verifiable in full. Cursor's changelog entry for Start puts the launch at July 28, 2026: ₹649 per month, tax inclusive, billed in INR via UPI or card, monthly billing only, available to developers in India. Start covers the Cursor Models pool and cloud agents, and excludes the Other Models pool, on-demand usage, Bugbot, Auto, Automations and the Cursor SDK. Less than three months later it became a legacy plan, which Cursor now maps to Plus on The X Subscription.

What a buyer should take from the pattern: until October 2026 the plan names were stable and the metering under them was not; in October the names changed too. Budget with a review date rather than a fixed annual number, and check the pricing page again before any renewal.

What Teams and Enterprise actually cost

Teams pricing changed twice in 2026. In June, Cursor split Teams into Standard and Premium seats; Cursor's own post on the update explains that a small number of power users on any team drive most of the spend and most of the unpredictable overage. On October 12, The X Subscription replaced those seats with three tiers priced like the individual plans.

The current seat tiers, from Cursor's team pricing docs:

• Premium seat: $30/user/month, with the same weekly usage as the individual Premium plan.
• Super seat: $100/user/month, with 3.75x Premium's weekly usage.
• Ultra seat: $200/user/month, with 12.5x Premium's weekly usage. A Free seat ($0) is also available; it has no team usage allowance, so that member's usage draws from their own personal plan.

Teams can mix seat tiers, and billing is per active paid seat rather than a fixed headcount: upgrades apply right away at a pro-rated charge, and downgrades apply at the end of the billing period. Seats don't share weekly pools, and usage doesn't transfer between members. Third-party models, and any usage past a seat's pool, come out of a prepaid balance the whole team shares. Teams created before October 12 keep legacy Standard ($40) and Premium ($120) seats with monthly pools and on-demand usage unless they switch. Enterprise sits above Teams for organizations that need pooled usage, invoicing, SCIM and priority support, priced only through a sales conversation.

Billing surprises, and how to avoid each one

Most of the "why did this cost more" stories come from a handful of mechanics that are documented but easy to miss. All of these are from Cursor's billing help page and its Teams pricing docs, read October 19, 2026.

Third-party usage on Teams is prepaid from the first request. On The X Subscription, Claude, GPT and Gemini requests draw from a prepaid team balance, and additional usage stops when the balance is empty or the team's monthly limit is reached. Auto Top-up keeps engineers working but brings back the open-ended bill, so set the monthly limit before turning it on. Legacy Teams still default to on-demand usage billed in arrears, which is why the first invoice there is the one to read line by line.

Per-member limits now exist on Teams. On The X Subscription, admins set one monthly additional usage limit for the team, plus a default monthly limit per member and per-member overrides. Group-level spend limits and granular spend controls remain Enterprise features. Legacy Teams only get a team-wide on-demand limit.

Removing someone mid-cycle does not always stop the charge. Cursor bills per active paid seat, so adding a member mid-cycle creates a pro-rated charge, but removing a member who has already used credits keeps that seat occupied until the cycle ends. Adjustments show up as account credit on a later invoice rather than as an immediate refund. Plan offboarding around the renewal date if seat count is tight.

Prices exclude tax. Every plan on The X Subscription displays its price before tax (the legacy India-only Start plan, at ₹649 tax inclusive, is the exception), so the number on the pricing page is not the number on the card.

Cursor sells direct only. Cursor states plainly on its pricing page that subscriptions are sold only directly through X Subscription Corp., that it does not authorize resellers or third-party sellers, and that subscriptions bought elsewhere may be suspended. If your procurement process routes software through a reseller, that is a conversation to have with Cursor sales before you plan a rollout, not after.

Renewal dates do not move. Adding or removing members leaves the team's renewal date where it was, which matters if you were expecting a seat change to reset the cycle.

What vantage.sh and superblocks.com say about it

Two independent breakdowns, both written before The X Subscription, are worth reading if you want a second opinion beyond Cursor's own pages. Vantage's Cursor pricing explainer (March 2026) frames the whole 2025 shift as economically rational but poorly executed: moving from flat "fast request" allotments to real token-based billing made sense as frontier models got more expensive to run per task, but the rollout itself was rocky and under-communicated.

Superblocks' breakdown (July 2026) is more bottom-line focused: it argues Cursor is worth the cost for full-time developers specifically because Pro's $20 pays for itself if it saves even an hour of billable time a month, provided you default to Auto mode and reserve manual model selection for genuinely hard problems. Both sources agree on the same underlying point, worth noting since neither has a reason to be generous to the other's framing: the sticker price on Cursor's plans is not the number that determines your actual bill. Usage pattern is.

Cursor vs Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Code

Every one of these tools meters something different, so the sticker prices are not directly comparable. The table below is what each vendor published on October 19, 2026. Where a vendor's own page and a third-party roundup disagreed, I used the vendor page.

Three things in that table are worth more than the numbers.

Copilot is the cheapest predictable option, and it is predictable on purpose. GitHub's plan documentation sets Pro at $10/month with 1,000 base plus 500 flex credits, Pro+ at $39 with 7,000, Max at $100 with 20,000, Business at $19 per granted seat with 1,900 credits per user, and Enterprise at $39 per seat with 3,900. Overage is a flat $0.01 per AI credit, credits pool across an enterprise, and completions are excluded from metering entirely. If your finance team wants a number it can multiply by headcount, that is the model that gives them one.

Anthropic publishes a real per-developer cost for agentic coding, and it is not small. Claude Code's cost documentation states that across enterprise deployments the average is around $13 per developer per active day and $150 to $250 per developer per month, with 90% of users staying below $30 per active day. That is the most honest public benchmark I have found for what heavy agent usage actually costs when it is billed at API rates rather than hidden inside a subscription. Subscription pricing for Claude itself runs Pro at $17/month on annual billing or $20 monthly, Max from $100/month, and Team seats at $20 or $100 per seat on annual billing, per Claude's pricing page. A fuller breakdown is in Claude Code pricing.

Windsurf's pricing page no longer exists as its own page. As of October 19, 2026, windsurf.com/pricing still redirects to devin.ai/pricing, and the plans shown there are Devin's: Free, Pro at $20/month, Max at $200/month, Teams at $80/month for the team plan plus $40/month per full dev seat, and Enterprise on request. If you are comparing Cursor against Windsurf on the strength of a quote from six months ago, re-check it. An earlier breakdown is at Windsurf pricing, and a wider field comparison is in the best AI for coding.

Worked cost scenarios, with the assumptions stated

These are arithmetic, not survey data. Every assumption is stated so you can swap in your own and rerun it. The per-seat prices come from Cursor's pricing page and Team Pricing docs; the plan fit comes from Cursor's own guidance in its Models & Pricing docs, which recommends Premium for new Agent users, Super for daily Agent users and Ultra for power users running several agents or Automations. Third-party model spend sits on top of every scenario and depends on how often you pick Claude or GPT over Cursor's own models.

Scenario one: one developer, light agent work. Assumption: stays on Cursor's own models. Plus at $8 covers Agent with Cursor models at fixed settings, but not Auto, Cloud Agents or third-party models. Premium at $30 ($300 a year, or $25/month equivalent) is the first tier with those. Pick by whether you need them, not by usage.

Scenario two: one developer running agents all day. Assumption: most runs stay on Cursor models, with Claude or GPT for hard problems. Cursor recommends Super at $100 for daily Agent users, and that covers the Cursor-model side. The third-party side is prepaid credit at list price on top, so a habit of picking a $10-in, $50-out model for routine work is real money. Ultra at $200 only makes sense once a few weeks of data show the Super pool running out, which is Cursor's power-user description, not a starting assumption.

Scenario three: a 10-person engineering team. Assumptions: seven developers use agents moderately on Premium seats, three run them constantly on Super seats, monthly billing. Seven seats at $30 plus three at $100 is $210 plus $300, or $510/month in seats. Now add the metering layer most comparisons skip: every third-party request is paid from the team's prepaid balance at list price plus the Cursor Token Rate of $0.25 per million tokens, so 100 million tokens of third-party traffic in a month adds $25 in token-rate fees alone. That rate is not what makes bills jump. Model selection is. If those three heavy users default to a $10-in, $50-out model rather than a $0.50-in, $2.50-out one, the difference between those two habits is far larger than the entire token-rate line.

Scenario four, for the finance question underneath all of this: 40 developers. Assumption: 30 Premium and 10 Super seats. That is 30 times $30 plus 10 times $100, or $1,900/month, $22,800/year, before any third-party usage. Cursor's docs point larger teams to its enterprise sales address for volume discounts rather than publishing them, so treat that as a list-price ceiling rather than a quote. For a broader cross-vendor view, see enterprise AI pricing compared.

How to cut a Cursor bill without dropping the tool

Every lever here maps to something Cursor documents, so each one is checkable rather than folk wisdom.

Default to Cursor's own models. They are the only models inside the included weekly pool, and Grok and Composer are exempt from the Cursor Token Rate on Teams and Enterprise. This is the single largest lever and it costs nothing to pull. One caveat worth reading carefully in the docs: on Teams and Enterprise with Cursor Router on, Balance and Intelligence bill at the list price of whichever model they route each request to, and third-party routes still incur the token rate. Cost mode, the old Auto, bills as a Cursor-model request.

Reserve premium models for the work that needs them. Given the roughly 20x spread between the cheapest and most expensive published rates, the habit of leaving an expensive model selected between hard problems is expensive in a way that is invisible while it is happening.

Set the monthly limit before turning on Auto Top-up. On Teams, add a default per-member limit too. Group-level limits are an Enterprise feature and should be raised during the sales conversation rather than discovered later.

Watch the admin dashboard rather than the invoice. Cursor shows team usage in its dashboard and exposes per-member spend through its Admin API, so a team can see the shape of the month before the month is billed.

Mix seat types instead of upgrading everyone. Put the team on Premium seats, measure a few weeks, and move only the confirmed heavy users to Super. Upgrades apply immediately at a pro-rated charge rather than at renewal.

Take the annual price once usage is stable, not before. Annual billing on the individual plans works out to two months free (Premium is $300 a year instead of $360), but it is the wrong commitment to make in month one while you are still learning which tier you need.

Trim the context you send. Input tokens are billed at full rate while cache reads are billed at a fraction of it, for example $2 versus $0.20 per million on Claude Sonnet 5 at published rates. Large, unfocused prompts across big codebases are the usage pattern that Superblocks also flags as a top credit drain.

Legacy subscribers should price the switch before taking it. Switching to The X Subscription is permanent, and it trades included third-party usage for more Cursor-model usage. Someone on legacy Pro who mostly runs Claude would pay $30 for Premium plus third-party credit, against $20 today.

Switching costs: what moves with you and what does not

Pricing decisions are cheap to reverse only if the work inside the tool is portable. For Cursor, a fair amount is.

What moves. Agent instructions are the portable part, and they are the part teams put the most work into: Cursor's rules documentation confirms support for `AGENTS.md` in the project root and, more recently, in subdirectories, which is a plain-markdown format that several other agentic coding tools also read. Teams that write their standing instructions as `AGENTS.md` rather than Cursor-specific rule files keep them portable at no cost. MCP server configuration is likewise just config, and is the layer most likely to survive a tool change, which is the argument in how to choose MCP servers for your team.

What does not move. Bugbot's review history, team usage analytics, the team marketplace of internal rules, skills and plugins, cloud agent and automation setups with shared team context, and any per-seat usage history you have built up for forecasting. None of that has an export path to a competitor. Cursor-specific rule files in `.cursor/rules` carry metadata that a plain markdown file does not.

The commercial switching cost. Annual billing is where the real lock-in sits, not the file formats. A team on monthly billing can leave at the next renewal date. A team on annual billing across 40 seats has committed for the year, which is exactly why the annual price is worth taking after a usage baseline exists rather than during evaluation.

Who Cursor is genuinely wrong for

Cursor is a strong product and the honest answer is still that several kinds of team should buy something else.

Shops standardized on JetBrains or Xcode. Cursor offers integrations for both, but the product is an editor, and most of what you pay for is the experience inside that editor. A team that will not leave IntelliJ or Xcode is paying for a workflow it will not use. Copilot, which lives inside the IDE you already have, fits that team better.

Teams that need spend controls by group or department on a self-serve plan. Teams now has per-member limits, but group-level settings and spend limits are Enterprise-only. If the reason you are buying is to cap one department's usage and Enterprise is out of scope, the tool does not do that at the tier you are buying.

Organizations whose procurement requires invoicing, wire transfer or a reseller. Self-serve plans take cards only, invoicing is an Enterprise conversation, and Cursor does not authorize resellers at all.

Budget owners who need a number that does not move. Metered usage is the correct model for the underlying economics and a genuinely hard model to forecast in the first quarter. If a fixed per-seat line item matters more than getting the best model on the hardest problems, Copilot Business at $19 with a fixed credit allowance is the more honest fit.

Developers who mainly want autocomplete. If agent runs are occasional and completions are the real value, Copilot Pro at $10/month covers unlimited code completions, a third of Cursor Premium's price.

Teams with a hard no-external-inference rule. Cursor's answer to data concerns is privacy mode, which its pricing page describes as a guarantee that code data is not used for training by Cursor or its model providers. That is a training guarantee, not an on-premise deployment. If your requirement is that code never leaves your network at all, privacy mode does not satisfy it and the conversation belongs with Cursor's enterprise team rather than on the self-serve plans.

Is Cursor worth it, and how to budget for it

For an individual developer, Premium at $30/month is the realistic starting point if you want Claude or GPT inside Cursor; Plus at $8 works if Cursor's own models are enough. Staying on Cursor models for routine work and reserving third-party picks for the hardest tasks is what keeps credit spend down. Super and Ultra exist for people who've already confirmed, from actual usage, that they regularly exhaust Premium's pool rather than as a starting insurance policy.

For a team, mixed seat tiers are easier to budget than a single seat type: put most of the team on Premium seats, watch real usage for a few weeks, and move only the confirmed heavy users to Super rather than guessing upfront. Given how visibly the June 2025 change caught people off guard, and how quickly the October 2026 change followed, any team evaluating Cursor now should also ask, explicitly, how third-party usage is billed and what the team and per-member limits are, rather than assuming the current pricing page is the final word on what a bill will look like three months in.

Where a tool like Coworker MCP fits alongside Cursor

Cursor is a coding assistant. It writes and edits code inside the editor, and its pricing model reflects exactly that: usage tied to how much AI-driven editing and agent work a developer actually runs. Coworker MCP solves a different, adjacent problem: giving that same AI tooling unified context across the rest of a company's systems, the Jira ticket describing the bug being fixed, the Slack thread where a customer reported it, the CRM record tied to the account affected, through one governed connection to 50+ apps rather than a pile of individually-installed servers.

The two aren't competing for the same budget line. A team can run Cursor for the actual coding and Coworker MCP for the context that coding work depends on, the same distinction covered in more detail in Windsurf's pricing breakdown, Cursor's closest direct competitor. If governance is part of what you're evaluating alongside cost, what enterprise MCP deployment actually requires and MCP security cover the parts of that evaluation that don't show up on either company's pricing page. For the basics of the protocol itself, see what MCP is.

Book a demo to see how Coworker MCP connects to the coding tools your team already runs.

A note on where this page fits in search

Cursor's own site is not easy to out-rank for "cursor pricing." In an Ahrefs SERP check on October 19, 2026, cursor.com held the top organic result with five sitelinks (four Cursor pages and a Cursor forum thread), and the AI Overview cited mostly Cursor's own pricing and docs pages alongside vantage.sh, finout.io, jetadmin.io, superblocks.com and a YouTube video. The realistic goal for a page like this one isn't unseating Cursor's own pricing page on day one. It's being accurate and specific enough, with real sourced numbers rather than a rehash of the pricing page, to earn a place in that same citation cluster over time, the same bet I've made on the enterprise MCP coverage where an AI Overview owns a similar amount of the SERP.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Cursor cost per month?

On The X Subscription, which new customers have bought since October 12, 2026: Free, Plus $8/month, Premium $30/month, Super $100/month and Ultra $200/month. Teams seats cost $30, $100 or $200 per user per month, and Enterprise is priced on request. Legacy plans (Pro $20, Pro+ $60, Ultra $200, Teams $40 or $120 per seat) continue for existing subscribers.

Why did my Cursor bill jump after I'd been paying the same amount for months?

Most often because more of your work ran on third-party models like Claude or GPT. On The X Subscription those are never in the included pool: they bill at API list price from prepaid credit. On legacy plans they draw from a separate monthly Other Models pool, and once it runs out, on-demand usage bills at API rates.

How much does Cursor cost for a team of 10?

On The X Subscription, 10 Premium seats cost $300/month. Moving the three heaviest users to Super seats raises that to $510/month before any third-party usage, since Teams bills per active seat at $30, $100 or $200.

Is Cursor cheaper than GitHub Copilot?

No, not on sticker price. Copilot Pro is $10/month against Cursor Premium's $30 (Cursor Plus is $8 but covers only Cursor's own models), and Copilot Business is $19 per seat against Cursor Teams at $30. Copilot also excludes code completions from metering entirely and charges a flat $0.01 per AI credit on overage. Cursor costs more and gives you direct control over which frontier model runs each request, which is what heavy agent users are actually paying for.

What is the Cursor Token Rate?

It is a $0.25 per million token charge that applies on Teams and Enterprise plans to third-party model requests, on top of that model's API price. It covers input, output and cached tokens, applies when Cursor Router's Balance or Intelligence mode routes to a third-party model, and applies to bring-your-own-key usage. Cost mode and Cursor's own models, Grok and Composer, are exempt, and individual plans don't pay it.

Can I set a spending limit in Cursor?

Yes. On The X Subscription, a monthly additional usage limit caps how much paid additional usage you can consume each month, and Teams admins can also set a default limit per member with per-member overrides. Group-level spend limits are Enterprise-only. Legacy Teams have a team-wide on-demand limit, with on-demand usage on by default.

How much does Cursor cost on annual billing?

On The X Subscription, annual billing is $80/year for Plus, $300 for Premium, $1,000 for Super and $2,000 for Ultra, which works out to two months free. Prices exclude tax.

Does Coworker MCP replace Cursor?

No. Cursor is a coding assistant that writes and edits code in the editor. Coworker MCP connects AI tools, including Cursor, to the rest of a company's systems (project trackers, chat, CRM, and more) through one governed connection. Teams typically run both rather than choosing between them.

Related reading

• Windsurf Pricing in 2026: Free, Pro, Teams, and Max
• Enterprise AI Pricing Compared
• How to Choose MCP Servers for Your Team